Home

What is the argument in favor of electing the president by a national popular vote?

The Electoral College - Pros and Con

  1. ority president the risk of so-called faithless Electors, the possible role of the Electoral College in depressing voter turnout, an
  2. National Popular Vote, a proposed interstate compact, would solve these problems and make every vote count. It would assure the election of the presidential candidate who wins the largest number of..
  3. The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as a compromise between electing the president via a vote in Congress only or via a popular vote only. The Electoral College comprises 538 electors; each state is allowed one elector for each Representative and Senator (DC is allowed 3 electors as established by the Twenty-Third Amendment)

9.1.26 MYTH: The National Popular Vote compact is unconstitutional because it would prevent a tie in the Electoral College and thereby deprive the U.S. House of Representatives of its rightful opportunity to choose the President As the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement steps up its effort to impose a direct election for president, attempting to enlist states with a sufficient number of electors to constitute a majority (268) and to bind them to the winner of the national popular vote, those states considering the proposal might first reflect on the nightmare aftermath of the 2000 presidential election Under a national popular vote, they might only help elect Democratic electors about half of the time. But if this argument were true, then the many strongly Republican states with large racial minority populations would be liable to challenges under Section two of the Voting Rights Act I assumed their arguments against a national popular vote were valid. But with each new claim, even basic research undermines the opposition to the movement toward a national popular vote to elect..

The Argument: Should the president be chosen by popular vote

To be elected president, the winner must get at least half plus one — or 270 electoral votes. This hybrid system means that more weight is given to a single vote in a small state than the vote of someone in a large state, leading to outcomes at times that have been at odds with the popular vote The Electoral College gives small states more political power and prevents more populous states from dominating (the Senate was designed for the same reason). 2) Travel and information-gathering was hard in the 1700s. The Electoral College met in one place, so the people voting to elect the president could get up-to-date information An amendment needs to be ratified by three-quarters of states and two-thirds of each chamber of Congress. Even though an overwhelming majority of Americans support a national popular vote for election of the president, a small minority of the country can block reform if only pursued in the form of amendment Currently, Hillary Clinton is ahead in the popular vote, while Donald Trump, the president-elect, leads in electoral votes. By 54 percent to 41 percent, more Americans favor amending the..

By referendum on Election Day, Colorado became the 15th state (plus the District of Columbia) to join an interstate compact to elect the president by popular vote. Minnesota is not yet one of them... And as we look to 2020, that means Democrats waging a war against the Electoral College. If only we elected presidents by popular vote, the argument goes, Hillary Clinton would be president now and Donald Trump would be marketing hotel rooms and selling overpriced steaks. Or something like that The NPVC is a proposed interstate compact in which the signatory states agree that they will appoint their presidential electors in accordance with the national popular vote rather than their own state electorate's vote

What are some arguments in favor of a direct popular election of the President? election if 2000 / each vote is equal What is the main argument in favor of limiting the President to a single 6 year term The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The Compact ensures that every vote, in every state, will matter in every presidential election NPV is a plan to change how we elect our president. Under the plan, each state signs a compact to award all its electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote. The compact comes into effect when states with a majority of presidential electors sign on

The NPV is a multi-state agreement that, when active, would ensure that the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote nationally also wins in the Electoral College. The states' approval of the compact is a victory for democracy and the principle of one person, one vote The answer is easy, or at least it should be: by a national popular vote — a system in which all votes count the same and the winner is the candidate who gets the most. But of course that's not how.. For example, 41% of Republican women favor amending the Constitution so the winner of the popular vote becomes president, compared with 24% of GOP men. Among Republicans, those who do not have a college degree (36%) are more likely than college graduates (23%) to favor deciding the election with the popular vote The National Popular Vote Initiative (NPV) Congressional Research Service 2 Proponents of the National Popular Vote initiative contend that their plan will achieve direct popular election while circumventing the requirements of Article V, and will guarantee that the popular vote winners will always be elected President and Vice President Through the National Popular Vote compact, states pledge to award all their electoral support to the winner of the popular national tally. Fifteen states and Washington, D.C., have signed on to date, representing 196 of the 270 votes necessary to secure the presidency (and the threshold at which the agreement takes effect)

The Electoral College: Top 3 Pros and Cons - ProCon

National Popular Vote, a proposed interstate compact, would solve these problems and make every vote count. It would assure the election of the presidential candidate who wins the largest number. If a national popular vote determined the presidency, each vote would be critical. Finally, proponents of the Electoral College can rely upon the argument that the Founders created the Electoral College for a reason. They didn't think that the public should directly elect the president. They considered that option and rejected it An additional argument is made by George C. Edwards in Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America (Yale University Press, 2004). He points out that nearly two dozen elections were so closely.

9.1 Myths about the U.S. Constitution National Popular Vot

Why National Popular Vote Is a Bad Idea HuffPos

The National Popular Vote lnterstate Compact (NPVIC) is a compact, or agreement, among the States to award all of their electoral votes collectively to the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote nationwide - Under the NPV system, everyone's vote will count equally, and the winner of the popular vote will be elected president House Bill 55, called the Agreement to Elect President by Popular Vote, is part of a national agenda to snooker state legislators into disenfranchising the will of their own state's voters. the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote, 2010 Mass. Acts ch. 229; Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote, 2007 N.J. Laws 2094; Presidential Election—Popular Vote—States' Agreement—Washington, 2009 Wash. Sess. Laws 1390 A recent INSIDER poll found that 54% of Americans support electing the president by popular vote, with just 30% of respondents preferring the Electoral College

Video: Dispelling the Major Legal Arguments Against the National

Under direct election, most of the incentives toward moderate, broadly based, two-party competition are removed. It is true that a sizable popular plurality—40 percent—would be required for victory. But that, without more, is insufficient to sustain two-party competition of the kind we have known December 29, 2020. The most popular argument against the Electoral College is that it violates the fundamental principle underlying democratic society: political equality, or, commonly phrased as. The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four Defendant States — Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — independently given President Trump's.

In the current system of selecting the president, a candidate could win the presidency by winning only 50% plus 1 vote of the popular vote in the 11 biggest states Official Blue Book argument: 1) A national popular vote for President advances the democratic principle of one person, one vote, and ensures that votes in every community count equally. The national popular vote for President could also encourage candidates to campaign in a way that addresses the concerns of voters in all 50 states First, the Electoral College forces candidates to appeal to a wider range of voters. A direct, national popular vote would incentivize campaigns to focus almost exclusively on densely populated urban areas; Clinton's popular-vote edge in 2016 arose from Democratic voting in just two places — Los Angeles and Chicago A majority of voters says the Electoral College system should be abandoned in favor of a national popular vote, according to a new poll. The latest NBC News-Wall Street Journal survey finds that. WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Heading into the 2020 presidential election, three in five Americans favor amending the U.S. Constitution to replace the Electoral College with a popular vote system, marking a six-percentage point uptick since April 2019.This preference for electing the president based on who receives the most votes nationwide is driven by 89% of Democrats and 68% of independents

Facts support national popular vote TheHil

Colorado is the latest state to adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which seeks to essentially abolish the Electoral College without going through the near-impossible task of. Electoral Vote vs. Popular Vote. In a presidential election, the popular vote simply means an aggregate of all voters from all states in America. The candidate who gets the most votes nationwide is said to have won the popular vote. But the winner of the popular vote may end up losing the election, like Al Gore did in 2000 and Hillary Clinton.

The current calls by some Democrats for abolishing the Electoral College in favor of the popular vote would not solve the issue of weighted votes. Instead of creating a system in which each state has power in the election of the president, the popular vote rather would give extreme weight to largely populated states and urban areas The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an interstate compact to award member states' presidential electors to the candidate that receives the most votes nationwide. The NPVIC would go into effect if states representing at least 270 electoral college votes adopt the legislation. As of May 2021, 15 states and Washington, D.C., had adopted legislation to join the National Popular.

The U.S. president is not elected by a majority of the popular vote. Under the Constitution, the candidate who wins the majority of 538 electors, known as the Electoral College, becomes the next. The argument of those who believe this way has many components. First, the Electoral College is felt to be an outdated system which is no longer necessary for our elections (The Electoral College). Opponents of the College admit that yes, at one point in time, the Electoral College was a necessary component in electing the President of the Union Posner also stated that a popular vote election would likely require a runoff mechanism in cases where no candidate receives a majority of votes. He cited the 1968 and 1992 elections as examples where the absence of a popular vote majority would lead to serious questions about the president's mandate without the Electoral College Out of that came the U.S. Constitution. One of the most hotly contested topics was how we elect our president. On the one hand you had the Federalists, who thought Congress should elect the president, and on the other you had those who thought the president should be elected by popular vote. But both were a little problematic

Electoral College vs

While the Electoral College would not be eliminated, the result would be a president elected by a national popular vote. To date, 15 states and the District of Columbia have signed on, with a. March 17, 2014. In an op-ed in the Strib's Sunday opinion section, Annette Meeks, CEO of the righty Freedom Foundation of Minnesota, argued that the so-called National Popular Vote plan would be. 1 The National Popular Vote initiative is examined later in this report, under Criticisms and Reform Proposals in Brief. It is also the subject of CRS Report R43823, The National Popular Vote Initiative: Direct Election of the President by Interstate Compact, by Thomas H. Neale and Andrew Nolan

In last week's election, for example, Obama received 61.7 percent of the electoral vote compared to only 51.3 percent of the popular votes cast for him and Romney. (I ignore the scattering of. There's a plan afoot to replace the Electoral College, and your state may already be part of it. Colorado became the latest state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, now one of. • A national popular vote election would require more national control over the election process. • A national popular vote election would increase the mistaken idea that the purpose of.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. However, a constitutional amendment is not the only means by which an alternative to the current Electoral College can be implemented Some wanted the Congress to elect our president. Large-state delegates such as Madison of Virginia naturally favored direct popular election. The Electoral College was an ingenious compromise, allowing the popular election of the president, but on a state-by-state basis. Citizens vote for president, with the winner in each state taking all the. However, we urge voters to vote yes on Proposition 113, and help this nation get to a popularly elected president. The winner-takes-all electoral college system adopted by all but two states gives. Arguments for the Electoral College. contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system, and. maintains a federal system of government and representation It's called, rather plainly, National Popular Vote.. I've heard all the arguments in favor of the Electoral College, and in my humble opinion they are lame, bordering on laughable. I.

9.1.1 MYTH: A federal constitutional amendment is necessary for changing the current method of electing the President. 9.1.2 MYTH: The traditional and appropriate way of changing the method of electing the President is by means of a federal constitutional amendment. 9.1.3 MYTH: The Electoral College would be abolished by the National Popular Vote compact. 9.1.4 MYTH: The Founding Fathers. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact still respects the constitutional role of the states in selecting the president, but it does so through a popular mandate The debate over the continued use of the Electoral College resurfaced during the 2016 presidential election, when Donald Trump lost the general election to Hillary Clinton by over 2.8 million votes and won the Electoral College by 74 votes. The official general election results gave Trump 304 Electoral College votes and 46.09% of the popular vote (62,984,825), and Hillary Clinton received 227. The National Popular Vote interstate compact will go into effect when enacted by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes—that is, enough to elect a President (270 of 538). At that time, every voter in the country will acquire a direct vote for a group of at least 270 presidential electors supporting their choice for President This past week, Colorado joined a growing list of states that have signed on to the National Popular Vote Compact (NPVC).The NPVC is a proposed interstate compact in which the signatory states agree that they will appoint their presidential electors in accordance with the national popular vote rather than their own state electorate's vote

A National Popular Vote for President - FairVot

The answer is easy, or at least it should be: by a national popular vote — a system in which all votes count the same and the winner is the candidate who gets the most. But of course that's. Opponents of a nationwide vote for President complain that if 100% of the voters of the 11 biggest states were to vote for one candidate, they alone could elect a President—while ignoring the fact that 50.01% of the voters of these same 11 states could elect a President today under the current state-by-state winner-take-all system The National Popular Vote, Explained. In 2019, Colorado, New Mexico, Delaware and Oregon became the latest states to take a stand against the Electoral College and join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPV). The NPV is a multi-state agreement that, when active, would ensure that the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote.

Poll: More Americans believe popular vote should decide

The National Popular Vote, Explained Brennan Center for